As the second special legislative session nears its end on or before Sept. 13, a lot of attention has been paid to Gov. Greg Abbott signing a new congressional map into law, which could dramatically impact the 2026 midterms. But the Texas Legislature has been busy with other major items that will impact Austinites. Here’s a roundup of some of those top issues:
‘Bathroom Bill’ Passes With Increased Penalties
The Texas House passed a bill barring transgender people from using bathrooms in government buildings that match their gender identity. A last-minute amendment increased fines fivefold, up to $125,000 for repeated violations — making it the most financially punitive law of its kind in the U.S. The bill now needs one final vote in the Senate before it's sent to Gov. Abbott for consideration.
Hemp-Derived THC Ban Stalls
Senate Bill 6, which would have banned the sale of most cannabinoids except for CBD and CBG, has not advanced in the House. Currently, hemp-driven THC products are legal if they contain less than 0.3% THC. While attempts to ban these products have stalled, some new regulations ban certain THC vape pens. Lawmakers are debating whether to regulate or ban THC, which Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick would prefer, but the session’s upcoming end could suggest the status quo will remain.
Kerr County Camps Seek Relief
Three Kerr County youth camps are urging Patrick to reconsider proposed floodplain restrictions that would prevent cabins in flood-prone areas. The camps are also requesting expert input on floodplain boundaries and financial aid for costly rebuilding if the legislation passes, arguing the burden shouldn’t fall on families and private camps. While legislators have said they support safety measures, they argue that public funds can’t help private camps comply.
Bill to Limit Police Personnel Records Access Advances
Mount Pleasant Rep. Cole Hefner’s bill to keep certain law enforcement personnel records private has passed the Texas House, and would creates a statewide process for storing unsubstantiated claims in confidential department files. The bill allows limited exceptions for access after misconduct investigations. Supporters argue it protects officers’ reputations, while opponents claim it hides police misconduct from public scrutiny.
